The Herth Hope Index (HHI) is designed to assess hope levels and monitor changes in hope over time in adults experiencing illness.
The Herth Hope Index (HHI) is a 12-item self-report measure designed to assess hope in adults experiencing acute, chronic, or terminal illness. Developed as an abbreviated version of the 30-item Herth Hope Scale, the HHI captures the multidimensional nature of hope through three interconnected domains:
The HHI is useful for assessing hope levels, identifying specific areas requiring attention, and monitoring changes in hope over time to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies aimed at increasing hope.
The Herth Hope Index (HHI) yields a total score ranging from 12 to 84, with higher scores indicating greater levels of hope, as well as three subscale scores ranging from 4 to 28:



The Herth Hope Index (HHI) demonstrates robust psychometric properties across various clinical populations.
In the original validation study with 172 ill adults (acute, chronic, and terminal illness), the instrument showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .97) and strong test-retest reliability over 2 weeks (r = .91).
Concurrent validity was established through high correlations with the parent Herth Hope Scale (r = .92), the Nowotny Hope Scale (r = .81), and the Existential Well-Being Scale (r = .84). Divergent validity was demonstrated through negative correlation with the Beck Hopelessness Scale (r = -.73).
Factor analysis supported the three-factor structure, accounting for 61% of the total variance.
The HHI maintains robust reliability across various educational levels, ages, and illness phases (Cronbach’s alpha = .72-.98).
Hope plays a crucial role in how people adapt to illness and maintain wellness. Research shows that higher levels of hope are associated with better treatment adherence, improved coping strategies, and more positive health outcomes. Unlike optimism, which is a general expectation of positive outcomes, hope involves both the motivation to achieve goals (agency) and the ability to identify pathways to reach them. The HHI captures these multiple dimensions of hope, including one’s sense of future possibilities, readiness to engage with life, and connection to others. Measuring hope helps clinicians identify patients who may benefit from hope-enhancing interventions and track whether therapeutic approaches are effectively supporting this critical psychological resource.
The HHI serves multiple clinical purposes across healthcare settings. At initial assessment, it provides a baseline measure of hope that can inform treatment planning – for instance, low scores on the interconnectedness subscale might indicate a need for interventions focusing on social support and relationships. The brief 12-item format makes it feasible for repeated administration, allowing clinicians to monitor changes in hope levels throughout treatment. Individual items can serve as conversation starters to explore specific areas where hope may be challenged. For example, if a patient strongly disagrees with “I have a sense of direction,” this opens discussion about goal-setting and future planning. The measure is particularly valuable in palliative care, chronic illness management, and rehabilitation settings where maintaining hope despite challenging circumstances is essential for quality of life.
Hope assessment is particularly valuable at key transition points in healthcare: at diagnosis of serious illness, before major medical procedures, during treatment planning, and when patients face setbacks or disease progression. Regular monitoring is also important during long-term treatment for chronic conditions, as hope levels can fluctuate with changes in symptoms, functional ability, or life circumstances. In mental health settings, assessing hope is crucial when working with depression, as hopelessness is a key risk factor for suicidal ideation. The HHI’s brevity allows for frequent monitoring without causing assessment fatigue, making it practical to track hope levels at each clinical encounter if needed. This enables early identification of declining hope, allowing for timely intervention before it significantly impacts treatment engagement or wellbeing.
When HHI scores indicate low hope, several evidence-based interventions can be implemented based on which dimensions are most affected. For low temporality/future scores, interventions might include goal-setting exercises, breaking down overwhelming goals into achievable steps, and exploring meaningful short-term objectives. For challenges with positive readiness/expectancy, cognitive interventions addressing negative thought patterns, reminiscence therapy focusing on past successes, and activities that provide mastery experiences can be helpful. When interconnectedness scores are low, interventions might focus on strengthening social connections, addressing isolation, exploring spiritual resources, or facilitating peer support groups. Hope-focused therapy approaches combine these elements, helping individuals identify and pursue personally meaningful goals while building the motivation and pathways thinking necessary to achieve them. The HHI can be administered regularly to track whether these interventions are effectively enhancing hope across its different dimensions.
Herth, K. (1992). Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(10), 1251-1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01843.x
Herth, K. (1992). Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(10), 1251-1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01843.x