Client Presentation and Context:
- Brief summary of presenting concerns and current life circumstances
- Any relevant updates or changes since the previous session
- What brought the client to therapy or what they hope to address
- Significant life events or contextual factors shaping the client’s experience
Problem Story:
- Description of the dominant problem-saturated story
- Language used by the client to describe their difficulties
- Impact of the problem across relevant life domains (relationships, work, self-perception, daily functioning)
- Any secondary problem stories, clearly distinguished from the dominant one
Externalising Conversations:
- Name given to the problem and whether it was client-generated or collaboratively developed
- How the problem was separated from the client’s identity
- Specific externalising language used by the therapist or client
- Exploration of the problem’s tactics, strategies, or methods of operation
- Mapping of the problem’s influence across life domains
Relative Influence Questioning:
- Exploration of the problem’s influence on the client’s life, relationships, thoughts, feelings, and identity
- Exploration of the client’s influence on the problem
- Times when the client has resisted, challenged, or reduced the problem’s influence
- Client’s evaluation of the problem’s effects and whether they find them acceptable
Unique Outcomes and Sparkling Moments:
- Specific events, actions, or choices that represent exceptions to the problem story
- How these unique outcomes were explored and elaborated upon
- Client language demonstrating agency, strength, or capacity that contradicts the dominant story
Re-authoring and Alternative Stories:
- Landscape of action: concrete events, behaviours, sequences, and plot development over time
- Landscape of identity/consciousness: meanings, values, beliefs, commitments, hopes, and personal qualities
- Linking of events across time (past, present, future) to support the alternative storyline
- How the emerging preferred story was thickened and enriched
- Any shifts in the client’s self-perception or understanding of their situation
Values, Commitments, and Purposes:
- Exploration of the client’s values, hopes, dreams, commitments, and purposes
- How values were discovered through responses to problems or through what is “absent but implicit”
- Connection between the client’s values and their sense of identity
Absent But Implicit:
- Values, hopes, or preferred ways of being lying beneath expressed pain or distress
- How the therapist inquired into stories and values that contrast with the problem story
- What the client’s responses to difficulty reveal about what they hold dear
Re-membering Conversations:
- Who was re-membered and why
- The figure’s contribution to the client’s life and identity
- How the client sees themselves through this figure’s eyes
- The client’s contribution to the figure’s life and what this reveals about their identity
Deconstruction of Dominant Discourses:
- Cultural, social, or political discourses explored in relation to the problem story
- Questioning of taken-for-granted assumptions or “truths” that support the problem
- How the problem story was broken into smaller parts to reduce overwhelm
Outsider Witness Practices:
- Who served as witnesses and what they witnessed
- Process and content of reflections
- Impact of witnessing on the client’s experience of their alternative story
Therapeutic Documents and Letters:
- Description and purpose of any therapeutic documents, letters, or certificates created or planned
- How these documents support the alternative story and provide a tangible resource between sessions
Client’s Responses and Insights:
- Moments of recognition, realisation, or new understanding
- Client engagement with narrative processes and any feedback provided
- Shifts in language, emotional state, or sense of agency during the session
- Expressions of hope, possibility, or renewed connection to values and preferred identity
Therapeutic Relationship and Collaboration:
- Quality of the therapeutic relationship and collaborative partnership
- How power dynamics were navigated and the therapist’s de-centred position
- Types of narrative questions used during the session
- Therapist’s stance of curiosity and “not-knowing”
- How agency was attributed to the client throughout
Therapist’s Reflections:
- Significant themes and direction of the narrative work
- Considerations and preliminary plans for future sessions
Safety and Wellbeing:
- Any concerns about immediate safety, including self-harm, suicidal ideation, or harm to others
- Safety plans developed or resources provided
- Protective factors and sources of support in the client’s life
Next Steps and Between-Session Tasks:
- Practices, experiments, or tasks committed to between sessions
- Rationale and connection to the client’s goals and values
- Scheduled date and time of the next session if discussed
Session Summary:
- Brief narrative summary (no more than four sentences) capturing the collaborative work, emerging alternative stories, and overall direction of treatment
Client Presentation and Context:
- Emma reported worsening low self-worth and social withdrawal following a recent conflict with a close friend
- Emma’s primary goal was to explore why she continues to feel “not good enough” despite evidence of competence in her professional life
Problem Story:
- The dominant problem story centred on a pervasive narrative of inadequacy that Emma described as following her since childhood, characterised by a persistent sense of “waiting to be found out”
- The problem has impacted multiple life domains: driving overpreparation and difficulty accepting praise at work, self-silencing in friendships, and persistent self-criticism internally
- A secondary problem story related to social anxiety was noted, though Emma identified the inadequacy narrative as the more dominant concern
Externalising Conversations:
- Emma collaboratively named the problem “the Imposter” — a voice that reminds her she does not belong, most active in moments of visibility, praise, or success
- The Imposter’s key tactics were mapped: minimising Emma’s achievements, amplifying others’ perceived capabilities, and framing connection as conditional on performance
Relative Influence Questioning:
- Emma described the Imposter’s influence as causing withdrawal from opportunities, deflecting compliments, and pre-emptively distancing from others
- When asked about moments of resistance, Emma recalled accepting a team leadership role despite the Imposter’s warnings, noting it felt “significant, even if I downplayed it at the time”
- Emma evaluated the Imposter’s influence as unwanted and contrary to her values
Unique Outcomes and Sparkling Moments:
- Emma identified two key unique outcomes: accepting the leadership role without deferring to a more senior colleague, and reaching out to repair her friendship following their conflict
- She tentatively reflected that these moments revealed a part of her that is “braver than the Imposter gives me credit for”
Re-authoring and Alternative Stories:
- Landscape of action: a sequence of events was mapped — applying for the leadership role, reaching out to her friend, and persisting with therapy despite early ambivalence
- Landscape of identity: Emma began articulating that these actions reflect a commitment to growth and a belief that she is worthy of connection
- Emma named this emerging part of herself “the part that keeps showing up,” noting it had been present longer than she had recognised
Values, Commitments, and Purposes:
- Emma identified genuine connection and meaningful contribution as her core values
- She reflected that the Imposter’s hold is painful precisely because it threatens what matters most to her, reframing her distress as an expression of how deeply she cares
Absent But Implicit:
- Emma’s distress at feeling “not good enough” was explored as reflecting a deep investment in being genuine and connected, rather than evidence of deficiency
- Emma described this reframe as “the first time this has made any sense”
Client’s Responses and Insights:
- Emma became noticeably more engaged when exploring unique outcomes and closed the session expressing cautious hopefulness, describing herself as “someone who keeps going, even when it’s hard”
- This represented a meaningful shift from her presentation at the outset, when she had described herself primarily through the Imposter’s lens
Therapeutic Relationship and Collaboration:
- The therapeutic relationship continued to deepen, with Emma showing greater willingness to explore difficult territory
- Emma reflected that she had felt genuinely heard and that the session helped her “see things differently”
Therapist’s Reflections:
- Future sessions will focus on thickening the alternative story through further unique outcomes, re-membering conversations, and deconstructing perfectionism-related discourses sustaining the Imposter’s influence
Next Steps and Between-Session Tasks:
- Emma agreed to keep a brief daily record of moments when “the part that keeps showing up” was present, as a way of gathering evidence for the alternative story
- Next session: Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 10:00 am
Session Summary:
- Emma externalised the dominant problem story as “the Imposter” and identified meaningful unique outcomes that contradict its influence
- Re-authoring conversations facilitated an emerging alternative story centred on connection and quiet persistence, supported by a between-session noticing task